The Worst Shark Tank Merchandise: 12 That Failed


Shark Tank is a actuality TV present constructed round entrepreneurs in search of investments of their corporations. A few of these corporations go on to realize success. The worst Shark Tank merchandise went completely nowhere and produced nothing however losses for his or her buyers.

Let’s check out among the lemons that Shark Tank has produced: the worst Shark Tank merchandise.

Shark Tank: How It Works

Shark Tank is predicated on a easy premise. Entrepreneurs carry their enterprise concepts into the Shark Tank and ask for cash in return for half possession of their corporations. A panel of buyers – the “sharks” – listens to the pitches, analyzes their potential, and decides whether or not to speculate.

Like all TV exhibits, Shark Tank was primarily developed for leisure: viewers get a vicarious thrill out of watching entrepreneurs lay their concepts on the road and seeing some shot down and others strolling away with a whole lot of hundreds in new capital.

Whereas Shark Tank is all about leisure, it has been a approach for some entrepreneurs to realize each cash and publicity, launching their corporations to success. It has additionally launched some spectacular flops. We’ll take a look at among the worst Shark Tank merchandise right here.

🦈 Be taught extra: Discover our roundup of the very best Shark Tank merchandise that made it huge, from revolutionary devices to groundbreaking providers.

The 12 Worst Shark Tank Merchandise

Changing into an entrepreneur isn’t as simple as it would first seem. It’s not sufficient to have a cool concept and produce it straight to market. You want to totally develop your marketing strategy, analysis the market, determine your target market, assess the competitors, develop an growth technique, take a look at the viability of your product, and extra.

These entrepreneurs have failed on a minimum of one among these accounts.

1. The Breathometer (2013)

Worst Shark Tank Products: The Breathometer homepage

At first look, the Breathometer, developed by Charles Michael Yim, appeared like an ingenious concept. Offered in season 5 of the present (2013), the transportable breathalyzer might pair up with a smartphone to learn the consumer’s blood alcohol ranges.

All 5 of the sharks determined to spend money on it, with Mark Cuban, Lori Greiner, Robert Herjavec, Kevin O’Leary, and Daymond John elevating 1 million in alternate for simply 30% of the enterprise’s fairness.

Issues arose after the funding, although. The enterprise couldn’t meet the heightened demand for the product. The product additionally failed to fulfill consumer expectations, delivering inaccurate outcomes and inflicting the Federal Commerce Fee (FDC) to step in.

It wasn’t lengthy earlier than the Breathometer needed to be taken off the market. The thought went down the drain, together with the cash invested by the sharks.

💵 Be taught extra: Discover 5 efficient methods to get cash to begin a enterprise, serving to you flip your entrepreneurial desires into actuality


2. CATEapp (2012)

Worst Shark Tank Products: CATEapp homepage
Worst Shark Tank Products: CATEapp homepage

In season 4 of the present (2012), the Shark Tank buyers heard a presentation from Neal Desai, inventor of CATEapp. Referred to as the “cheater’s app”, CATEapp supplied the power to cover messages from choose contacts, enabling them to solely be seen by the telephone’s major consumer.

Two of the sharks, Kevin O’Leary and Daymond John, had been intrigued sufficient to lift $70,000 in alternate for 35% fairness.

The app acquired hundreds of downloads after its Shark Tank look, nevertheless it shortly turned clear that the app was laden with bugs and leaked delicate data. Its options is also circumvented relatively simply. Furthermore, it couldn’t compete with related, extra dependable apps that got here to market.

CATEapp is not obtainable for downloads, and the cash invested in it’s gone, making it one of many worst Shark Tank merchandise.

📱 Be taught extra: Uncover  earn money along with your telephone utilizing our sensible suggestions and concepts that flip your gadget right into a income supply.


3. Candy Ballz (2013)

Worst Shark Tank Products: SweetBallz homepageWorst Shark Tank Products: SweetBallz homepage

Though the buyers in Shark Tank have, on a number of events, highlighted how dangerous investing in meals companies will be, Mark Cuban and Barbara Corcoran jumped on the alternative to spend money on Candy Ballz.

In season 5 James McDonald and Cole Egger offered their concept: promoting scrumptious little cake balls. The founders obtained $250,000 in alternate for 25% of their fairness, and all was good for some time.

Sadly, although, James and Cole had a falling out and even filed for restraining orders in opposition to each other.

Candy Ballz, now run by James, remains to be in enterprise right now, although it’s not almost as profitable because it might’ve been had he and his enterprise companion stayed on the identical web page. Candy Ballz might not have been one of many worst Shark Tank merchandise, nevertheless it was actually one of many worst partnerships!

📈 Be taught extra: Discover the highest picks for the finest meals shares & ETFs of 2024 to boost your funding portfolio.


4. Squirrel Boss (2013)

Worst Shark Tank Products: Squirrel Boss homepageWorst Shark Tank Products: Squirrel Boss homepage

Michael Desanti offered Squirrel Boss in season 4 (2013) of Shark Tank. At its core, it was a easy chook feeder, nevertheless it had a function that may ship an electrical shock to pests like squirrels to discourage them from stealing the chook meals. Supposedly, the shock wouldn’t hurt the squirrels.

The principle downside was that the product couldn’t differentiate between pests and birds and would shock any animal that got here into contact with it, a major design flaw that would hardly be missed.

Squirrel Boss was additionally costly and unpatented, so not one of the sharks had been keen to spend money on it.

Whereas it was obtainable on Amazon for some time, Squirrel Boss by no means took off resulting from its main design flaws and hefty worth.


5. Unique Man Candle (2011)

Worst Shark Tank Products: The Original Man Candle homepageWorst Shark Tank Products: The Original Man Candle homepage

The Unique Man Candle was the brainchild of Johnson Bailey, who believed that conventional scented candles had been too female.

Presenting his concept in season 2 of the present, Johnson tried to distinguish his product by introducing extra “masculine” scents that may supposedly attraction to the male target market.

Unsurprisingly, not one of the “sharks” had been concerned about investing within the Unique Man Candle. Which will have been because of the collection of scents supplied, which included “popcorn,” “golf course,” and “flatulence,” or because of the lack of a complete marketing strategy.


6. ToyGaroo (2011)

Worst Shark Tank Products: Toygaroo homepageWorst Shark Tank Products: Toygaroo homepage

ToyGaroo is among the better-known failures from Shark Tank. Initially offered in season 2 (2011), ToyGaroo was based by Nikki Pope, Younger Chu, Hutch Postik, Phil Smy, and Rony Mirzaians.

The premise behind it was easy. ToyGaroo rented out youngsters’s toys in a subscription-based service. Mother and father might join the service, lease high-quality toys for a month, return them, and get a brand new batch, avoiding the issue of spending on toys solely to have the children lose curiosity.

Mark Cuban and Kevin O’Leary noticed the attraction, committing $250,000 to the enterprise.

Nevertheless, ToyGaroo wasn’t prepared for the heightened demand following the episode’s airing. Sourcing high-quality toys and transport them proved to be costlier than anticipated, main the enterprise to go bankrupt in months.

👉 Be taught extra: Be taught precisely what’s chapter and the steps concerned in declaring it, in our newest put up designed for readability and perception.


7. Trunkster (2015)

Worst Shark Tank Products: Trunkster homepageWorst Shark Tank Products: Trunkster homepage

Trunkster was a promising new firm that was purported to disrupt the journey trade. Based by Gaston Blanchet and Jesse Potash, it introduced a brand new stage of know-how to a really outdated product: baggage. The product was a sensible suitcase with helpful options like a GPS monitoring system, USB ports, a digital scale within the deal with, and extra.

Offered on Shark Tank in season 7, Trunkster caught the eye of Mark Cuban and Lori Greiner, who invested $1.4 million in alternate for 15% of the corporate.

The deal, nonetheless, fell via. Trunkster’s obvious $28 million valuation solely got here from presales on Kickstarter and Indiegogo and aggressive income projections. Many of the prospects who signed up for preorders by no means obtained their high-tech baggage and those that did obtained poor-quality merchandise that didn’t meet the expectations arrange by Trunkster’s advertising and marketing marketing campaign.

💳 Be taught extra: Discover our prime picks for the very best no-fee journey bank card choices in 2024, excellent for savvy vacationers seeking to save.


8. Wired Waffles (2012)

Wired Waffles homepageWired Waffles homepage

Wired Waffles was a flop from the get-go. First offered in season 4 of Shark Tank, the enterprise was based by Roger Sullivan.

Wired Waffles are caffeine-infused waffles that may supposedly assist busy individuals save time within the morning since they wouldn’t must make each espresso and breakfast.

Not one of the sharks had been concerned about investing on this. In spite of everything, caffeine as a easy ingredient couldn’t be patented. The product didn’t have a pleasing style, and worst of all, it may very well be ingested by youngsters by chance.

Wired Waffles is an ideal instance of what occurs when entrepreneurs don’t suppose their concepts via, fail to check the viability of their merchandise and don’t conduct correct market analysis.


9. Vestpakz (2014)

Vestpakz appeared like a promising product when it was offered throughout season 6 of the present (2014). Michael Woolley and Arthur Grayer created it as an revolutionary new youngsters’s backpack that would scale back the wearer’s again and shoulder ache.

Formed to seem like a vest and boasting loads of space for storing, it appeared like the proper product. Sadly, although, no shark wished to spend money on it.

Regardless of Vestpakz being obtainable in Walmart shops, the gross sales had been abysmal. The ratio between its manufacturing prices and promoting worth was too low, and there was minimal client demand. Finally, Vestpakz went out of enterprise.


10. Cougar Power (2012)

Cougar Energy homepageCougar Energy homepage

Cougar Power was a product developed by Ryan Custar and offered to Shark Tank buyers throughout season 3 (2012). As its identify suggests, it was an vitality drink designed for “cougars”, aka middle-aged single girls.

Supposedly, the drink wouldn’t solely carry the buyer’s vitality ranges up, however it could additionally positively have an effect on the hair and nails. Furthermore, it boasted “anti-aging” components, although none of those claims had been scientifically supportable.

Cougar Power obtained no investments in Shark Tank. Not one of the buyers believed there was a marketplace for such a product, nor did they imagine it could stand as much as rivals. With low gross sales and loads of unfavourable feedback on Amazon and social media, it was obvious that the buyers had been proper.


11. Wake N Bacon (2011)

Wake N Bacon was first offered by Matty Sallin in season 2 of Shark Tank. It was an alarm clock/oven that may begin cooking bacon 10 minutes earlier than wake-up time, thus waking the consumer as much as the candy scent of bacon.

The idea gained reputation on-line earlier than Matty got here on the present, with loads of individuals asking to purchase it.

Nevertheless, the sharks noticed it as a gag reward that may have few professional customers. Furthermore, it shortly turned obvious that Matty hadn’t thought the entire idea via. There have been no security guards that may decrease hearth dangers, as an example.

Matty hadn’t provide you with a promoting worth. He hadn’t developed a plan that may assist him promote extra models after making a prototype and had no gross sales projections.

All he had was an concept for a product and no plans to assist him market and promote it. Regardless of many on-line customers expressing a need for Wake N Bacon, the enterprise fell via as a result of there actually wasn’t a enterprise there within the first place, simply an concept.


12. Foot Fairy (2013)

Foot Fairy homepageFoot Fairy homepage

Foot Fairy was offered throughout season 5 of Shark Tank. Inventors Sylvie Shapiro and Nicole Brooks developed an app to assist mother and father measure their youngsters’s toes and purchase suitably sized footwear for them, thus minimizing the dangers of frequent foot points.

Foot Fairy can be free to make use of, and the corporate would earn commissions from widespread shops like Zappos.

Nevertheless, regardless of the app having hundreds of downloads previous to Sylvie and Nicole’s look on Shark Tank, the 2 had earned no commissions.

Whereas the idea, at its core, appeared attention-grabbing sufficient, there have been a few points that deterred the sharks from investing in it. The app was simple sufficient to repeat, which might deter any main retailers from providing commissions for it. Furthermore, it could have been a way more viable marketing strategy for Sylvie and Nicole to develop their very own model of footwear and use Foot Fairy to extend their gross sales.

Though one of many sharks did provide a deal, it by no means got here to fruition, and Foot Fairy is not obtainable.


Conclusion

Whereas there are a few outrageous Shark Tank pitches on this listing, some would probably have confirmed to be profitable had the entrepreneurs developed their concepts higher. In spite of everything, having a fantastic product concept is rarely sufficient to make sure the success of a enterprise. Entrepreneurs at all times must conduct thorough market, competitor, and viewers analysis. They should take a look at their merchandise’ viability, develop growth methods, and develop complete enterprise plans in the event that they hope to draw prospects and buyers.

Leave a Comment